Categories
Anxiety and stress Decision-making Decision-making DHL Expat Leadership Organisations Vietnam

DHL Vietnam misclassifies personal effects as “prohibited used goods”

DHL Vietnam misclassified my clothes and books as “prohibited used goods.” Vietnam law clearly treats them as personal effects with duty-free allowances. Read how I challenged their threat to destroy my shipment and what this means for anyone relocating to Vietnam

When a customer moves country, their clothes, books, and personal items aren’t a crime scene — they’re personal effects. Yet DHL Vietnam has been insisting my shipment can’t clear because “Vietnamese customs prohibits used goods.”

Here’s the problem: that’s not how the law works.

  • Decree 134/2016/ND-CP sets out duty-free allowances for personal luggage, including items sent before or after arrival. In other words, the exact scenario of unaccompanied baggage. 
  • Circular 38/2015/TT-BTC governs customs procedures brokers must apply. It is the framework for processing shipments like mine — not a blanket ban. 
  • Industry practice reflects the same: clothes & personal belongings are duty-free within reasonable quantity when they are personal, non-commercial. 

DHL’s clearance email, signed by Lê Trần Thu Hiền (Operations Department, Clearance Support Agent), threatened that my shipment could be destroyed “as per regulation.” That is a profound misreading. If VAT applies to low-value express consignments under Decision 01/2025/QĐ-TTg, assess it — but process the shipment correctly as personal effects.

On 22 August 2025, DHL Vietnam — through Le Tran Thu Hien, Clearance Support Agent at DHL–VNPT Express Limited — confirmed what I had begun to suspect: my shipment was trapped in an administrative cul-de-sac.

They told me that in order for my belongings to clear Customs, I would need to provide a Customs Declaration Form. The catch? This form is only issued to passengers at the airport upon arrival. I was never given one—and crucially, it cannot be obtained retroactively. In other words, DHL is demanding a document they know I cannot possibly provide.

At the same time, they flagged that Pack & Send’s invoice was incomplete — missing key details like the full item list and quantities. In other words, Pack & Send’s paperwork was sloppy at origin, and DHL’s response was to pass the problem straight down the line rather than solve it.

This isn’t customer service—it’s entrapment. Both companies admit their own errors in private correspondence, but instead of fixing the issue, they set conditions that no customer could ever meet. It’s the bureaucratic equivalent of holding my shipment hostage while pointing at each other.

I have asked DHL to:

  1. Reclassify the shipment under personal effects / unaccompanied baggage;
  2. Assign a named senior manager to own the fix.

The training from military service is resilience and persistence. We achieve outcomes—or die trying. I won’t let my personal belongings be quietly “destroyed” because someone misread a regulation.

If you’ve battled the same thing in Vietnam, tell me. The more sunlight, the faster this gets fixed.


DHL demanded I resolve my shipment issue by contacting their support team. I emailed every address they provided: vn-customercare@dhl.com expresscs.ap@dhl.com sgnclearance@dhl.com.vn prd@dhl.com Every single one bounced. Not one inbox exists. If a global courier can’t even keep its own email addresses alive, what hope does a customer have?
DHL demanded I resolve my shipment issue by contacting their support team. I emailed every address they provided: vn-customercare@dhl.com expresscs.ap@dhl.com sgnclearance@dhl.com.vn prd@dhl.com Every single one bounced. Not one inbox exists. If a global courier can’t even keep its own email addresses alive, what hope does a customer have?

Author